Trust

Our methodology.

How LoveQuarters chooses topics, researches them, writes them, and updates them. Plus what we will not do, even when it would be convenient.

Published 2026-05-01Last reviewed 2026-05-045 min read

This page is the closest thing to our editorial constitution. It describes what every cornerstone on the site is supposed to look like, how it gets there, and the lines we do not cross.

If you ever find a page on this site that does not meet what is below, email editorial@lovequarters.com and we will fix it.

METHODOLOGY · LQ EDITORIAL · METHODOLOGY · LQ EDITORIAL · METHODOLOGY · LQ EDITORIAL · METHODOLOGY · LQ EDITORIAL · METHODOLOGY · LQ EDITORIAL · METHODOLOGY · LQ EDITORIAL · METHODOLOGY · LQ EDITORIAL · METHODOLOGY · LQ EDITORIAL ·
Plain
Language target. Sixth to eighth grade reading level on every cornerstone.
Cited
Every statistic links to its source. No exceptions.
Dated
Every cornerstone shows publish and last-reviewed dates

How we choose topics

We start with what readers actually search for. The cornerstone topics on this site are the questions adults type into Google about their sex lives, sorted into four areas: lasting longer, intimacy, techniques, and basic guides.

We do not chase trends. We do not write about news cycles. The pages here are meant to stay accurate for years, with periodic review.

Our four standards

Every cornerstone is built against these.

01

Plain language

Sixth to eighth grade reading level. Short sentences. Common words. Latin medical terms only when necessary, and translated when used.

02

Real citations

Every statistic in our prose links directly to its source. Most are PubMed. Some are professional society directories (AASECT, Menopause Society). We never cite a number we have not personally read.

03

No fabrication, ever

No invented quotes attributed to real researchers. No invented testimonials presented as real reader correspondence. No imaginary statistics. If we cannot source a claim with a real reference, we either rephrase it or remove it.

04

Routes to professionals

We are not a clinic. When a topic crosses into medical territory we route readers to a directory of trained professionals rather than giving treatment advice ourselves.

What the research describes

What we will not do

We will not pretend to be a clinic. We will not put words in the mouths of named experts. We will not invent reader testimonials. We will not recommend prescription medications to specific readers. We will not accept payment to alter or improve a recommendation. We will not optimize content for search engines in ways that make it harder for humans to read. None of this is up for negotiation.

How a cornerstone gets made

Roughly the steps every page on this site follows.

01

Read the research

We pull the most-cited primary sources for the topic. PubMed first. Professional society guidance second.

02

Draft in plain language

We write at a sixth-grade reading level. Short sentences. No padding. No vague intensifiers like “substantially” or “dramatically.”

03

Cite inline

Every statistic gets a hyperlink to its source in the prose itself, not just in a list at the bottom.

04

Date and review

Every page shows a Published date and a Last reviewed date. Pages get reviewed at least annually, more often when research changes.

Common questions

Has this site been reviewed by a medical professional?
Not currently. Adding a clinician reviewer is on our roadmap. We disclose this on every cornerstone in the disclaimer block. Until a reviewer is in place, we treat all medical content educationally and route to clinicians for specifics.
Why don’t you cite specific medications?
Because we are not licensed to make individual medical recommendations and most medication choices depend on personal medical history we do not have. We name the categories where helpful (“prescription options exist”) and route the specifics to a doctor.
How do you handle conflicting research?
We acknowledge it. Sex-wellness research is uneven. Some areas (like the Waldinger 2005 IELT data) are well-replicated. Others have small sample sizes or methodological limitations. When we cite a less-replicated finding, we say so.
What happens when research updates?
We update the page and the Last reviewed date. If the change is significant, we add a note explaining what shifted.
How do I flag an error?
Email editorial@lovequarters.com. Specific is better than general. If you can point us at a source that contradicts what we wrote, we will read it and update or respond.

Sources

  1. PubMed (National Library of Medicine).
  2. AASECT directory of certified sex therapists.
  3. The Menopause Society.
  4. American Urological Association.
  5. International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health.